EU 4.73
· European ranking
11 / 30
Up 1 positions compared with previous year
Croatia: Income Inequality (Rich-Poor Gap)
An editorial snapshot of country living conditions with trend, regional spread, and context links.
Latest value
· 2025
4.78 Ratio
EU 4.73 · +0.0 pp vs Europe
What this indicator measures
Measures the ratio between the total equivalised disposable income received by the highest-income 20% of the population and that received by the lowest-income 20%. A ratio of 5 means the top fifth receives five times as much income as the bottom fifth.
Lower values generally represent a more favorable situation.
Data source: Eurostat Income quintile share ratio S80/S20 ilc_di11
Explore this indicator
Regional map
· 2025 · 4 regions
Loading map preview...
Internal regions
Comparison of values across the country's regions for this indicator.
-
1+10.88
5.30
-
2-10.04
4.30
-
2-10.04
4.30
-
4-12.13
4.20
More context on this indicator
At a glance
Croatia performs less favourably than the European benchmark on Income quintile share ratio S80/S20, although the difference is relatively small. The trend context points to recent reversal. The wider topic context is mixed, combining pressure signals and relative strengths. Regional evidence also shows internal variation.
European comparison in Croatia
In Croatia, S80/S20 ratio is close to the European benchmark, although slightly worse: 4.78 versus 4.73 in 2025, a gap of 0.05 in the ratio.
Recent trend
In Croatia, the medium-term pattern shows deterioration: the value moved from 4.59 in 2020 to 4.78 in 2025. The latest step, from 4.97 in 2024 to 4.78 in 2025, reverses the previous direction and shows recent improvement.
Regional differences in Croatia
In Croatia, regional values for S80/S20 ratio are relatively close. Across 4 comparable regions, Panonska Hrvatska records the highest value (5.3) and Sjeverna Hrvatska the lowest (4.2), a gap of 1.1 in the ratio.
Reading within the topic
In Croatia, Income & Purchasing Power shows a mixed picture: pressure signals and relative strengths coexist across this indicator and its related indicators compared with Europe. Material recent changes among related indicators lean towards improvement.