EU 11.38
· European ranking
21 / 30
No change compared with previous year
Finland: Material and Social Deprivation
An editorial snapshot of country living conditions with trend, regional spread, and context links.
Latest value
· 2025
7.50% of people
EU 11.38 · -3.9 pp vs Europe
What this indicator measures
Measures the share of people who, because they cannot afford them, lack at least 5 of 13 specified material or social items considered relevant to an adequate standard of living.
Lower values generally represent a more favorable situation.
Data source: Eurostat Material and social deprivation rate ilc_mdsd09
Explore this indicator
Regional map
· 2025 · 3 regions
Loading map preview...
Internal regions
Comparison of values across the country's regions for this indicator.
-
1+14.67
8.60
-
2-5.33
7.10
-
3-16.00
6.30
More context on this indicator
At a glance
Finland performs more favourably than the European benchmark on Material and social deprivation rate, with a moderate gap. The trend context points to recent stabilization. The wider topic context points to broader relative strength. Regional evidence also shows internal variation.
European comparison in Finland
In Finland, Material deprivation is noticeably better than the European benchmark: 7.5% versus 11.4% in 2025, with a gap of 3.9 percentage points.
Recent trend
In Finland, the medium-term pattern shows deterioration: the value moved from 4.60% in 2020 to 7.50% in 2025. The latest value changes little from 7.60% in 2024, indicating a pause in the previous deterioration.
Regional differences in Finland
In Finland, regional values for Material deprivation are relatively close. Across 3 comparable regions, Helsinki-Uusimaa records the highest value (8.6%) and Pohjois- ja Itä-Suomi the lowest (6.3%), a gap of 2.3 percentage points.
Reading within the topic
In Finland, the evidence for Quality of Life & Household Conditions leans towards relatively favourable performance compared with Europe, without a clear pressure signal dominating the picture. Material recent changes among related indicators lean towards improvement.