European ranking
17 / 30
Down 3 positions compared with previous year
An editorial snapshot of country living conditions with trend, regional spread, and context links.
Latest value
· 2025
15.40% of people
EU 16.23 · -0.8 pp vs Europe
European ranking
17 / 30
Down 3 positions compared with previous year
Recent trend
Open trendPopulation
10.7M
Country population · 2025
Measures the share of people whose equivalised disposable income after social transfers is below 60% of the national median. It is a relative-income measure rather than a measure of absolute poverty.
Lower values generally represent a more favorable situation.
Data source: Eurostat At-risk-of-poverty rate TESPM010
· 2025 · 9 regions
Comparison of values across the country's regions for this indicator.
Alentejo
17.90
17.30
Oeste e Vale do Tejo
17.20
Centro (PT)
17.00
16.60
PenÃnsula de Setúbal
15.70
15.60
15.10
Grande Lisboa
12.20
Portugal performs more favourably than the European benchmark on At-risk-of-poverty rate, although the difference is relatively small. The trend context points to clearer recent change. The wider topic context is mixed, combining pressure signals and relative strengths. Regional evidence also shows internal variation.
In Portugal, Poverty risk is close to the European benchmark and slightly better: 15.4% versus 16.2% in 2025, a gap of 0.8 percentage points.
In Portugal, the medium-term pattern is broadly stable: the value moved from 16.20% in 2020 to 15.40% in 2025. Although the primary period is broadly stable, the latest step, from 16.60% in 2024 to 15.40% in 2025, shows material improvement and provides a clearer recent signal.
In Portugal, regional values for Poverty risk are relatively close. Across 9 comparable regions, Alentejo records the highest value (17.9%) and Grande Lisboa the lowest (12.2%), a gap of 5.7 percentage points.
In Portugal, Poverty & Financial Vulnerability shows a mixed picture: pressure signals and relative strengths coexist across this indicator and its related indicators compared with Europe. Recent changes among related indicators are also mixed, with improvement in some and deterioration in others.