EU 20.40
· European ranking
8 / 30
No change compared with previous year
Serbia: Poverty & Social Exclusion Risk
An editorial snapshot of country living conditions with trend, regional spread, and context links.
Latest value
· 2025
23.20% of people
EU 20.40 · +2.8 pp vs Europe
What this indicator measures
Measures the share of people experiencing at least one of three conditions: risk of poverty after social transfers, severe material and social deprivation, or living in a household with very low work intensity. People meeting more than one condition are counted only once.
Lower values generally represent a more favorable situation.
Data source: Eurostat Persons at risk of poverty or social exclusion ILC_PEPS11N
Explore this indicator
Regional map
· 2025 · 4 regions
Loading map preview...
Internal regions
Comparison of values across the country's regions for this indicator.
-
1+27.59
29.60
-
2+12.93
26.20
-
3+9.05
25.30
-
4-45.69
12.60
More context on this indicator
At a glance
Serbia performs less favourably than the European benchmark on Persons at risk of poverty or social exclusion, with a moderate gap. The trend context points to confirmed improvement. The wider topic context points to broader pressure. Regional evidence also shows internal variation.
European comparison in Serbia
In Serbia, Poverty or exclusion is noticeably worse than the European benchmark: 23.2% versus 20.4% in 2025, with a gap of 2.8 percentage points.
Recent trend
In Serbia, the medium-term pattern shows improvement: the value moved from 31.00% in 2020 to 23.20% in 2025. The latest step, from 24.30% in 2024 to 23.20% in 2025, confirms the improvement. The recent signal is weaker than the primary one.
Regional differences in Serbia
In Serbia, Poverty or exclusion shows noticeable regional variation. Across 4 comparable regions, Southern and Eastern Serbia records the highest value (29.6%) and Belgrade Region the lowest (12.6%), a gap of 17 percentage points.
Reading within the topic
In Serbia, the evidence for Poverty & Financial Vulnerability leans towards pressure compared with Europe; related indicators do not provide a sufficiently strong counter-signal. Material recent changes among related indicators lean towards deterioration and warrant monitoring.