ES EN

Latvia: Inability to face unexpected financial expenses

An editorial snapshot of country living conditions with trend, regional spread, and context links.

Country: Latvia Indicator: Inability to face unexpected financial expenses Year: 2025

Country overview

Latvia

Current reading for Inability to face unexpected financial expenses in a European context.

Eurostat indicator: Inability to face unexpected financial expenses

Latest value

43.50 Percent of people

European ranking

2 / 30

No change from the previous year

Compared with Europe

+14.4 puntos

Latvia is 14.4 points above the European average.

EU: 29.09

Affected population

≈ 0.81 million people affected

Year: 2025

Explore this indicator

Map preview

Open map
Loading map preview...

Recent trend

Open trend

Latest: 43.70 Percent of people Europe benchmark: 29.09 Percent of people

Internal regions

Embedded regional ranking preview with real regional values and shared semantic bars.

Indicator: Inability to face unexpected financial expenses

Granularity: Regions

  1. 1

    Latvia

    43.50

More context on this indicator

At a glance

Latvia performs less favourably than the European benchmark on Inability to face unexpected financial expenses, with a large gap. The trend context points to confirmed improvement. The wider topic context points to broader pressure.

European comparison in Latvia

In Latvia, Unexpected expenses stands clearly worse than the European benchmark: 43.7% versus 29.1% in 2025, a large gap of 14.6 percentage points.

Recent trend

In Latvia, the medium-term pattern shows improvement: the value moved from 45.60% in 2020 to 43.70% in 2025. The latest step, from 45.30% in 2024 to 43.70% in 2025, confirms the improvement. The recent signal is stronger than the primary one.

Reading within the topic

In Latvia, the evidence for Poverty & Financial Vulnerability leans towards pressure compared with Europe; related indicators do not provide a sufficiently strong counter-signal. Material recent changes among related indicators lean towards deterioration and warrant monitoring.