ES EN

Lithuania: Persons at risk of poverty or social exclusion

An editorial snapshot of country living conditions with trend, regional spread, and context links.

Country: Lithuania Indicator: Persons at risk of poverty or social exclusion Year: 2025

Country overview

Lithuania

Current reading for Persons at risk of poverty or social exclusion in a European context.

Eurostat indicator: Persons at risk of poverty or social exclusion

Latest value

26.30 Percent of people

European ranking

5 / 30

Compared with Europe

+6.3 puntos

Lithuania is 6.3 points above the European average.

EU: 20.04

Affected population

≈ 0.76 million people affected

Year: 2025

Explore this indicator

Map preview

Open map
Loading map preview...

Recent trend

Open trend

Latest: 26.30 Percent of people Europe benchmark: 20.40 Percent of people

Internal regions

Embedded regional ranking preview with real regional values and shared semantic bars.

Indicator: Persons at risk of poverty or social exclusion

Granularity: Regions

  1. 1

    Vidurio ir vakarų Lietuvos regionas

    +16.70

    30.70

  2. 2

    Sostinės regionas

    -37.60

    16.40

More context on this indicator

At a glance

Lithuania performs less favourably than the European benchmark on Persons at risk of poverty or social exclusion, with a large gap. The trend context points to confirmed deterioration. The wider topic context points to broader pressure.

European comparison in Lithuania

In Lithuania, Poverty or exclusion stands clearly worse than the European benchmark: 26.3% versus 20.4% in 2025, a large gap of 5.9 percentage points.

Recent trend

In Lithuania, the medium-term pattern shows deterioration: the value moved from 24.50% in 2020 to 26.30% in 2025. The latest step, from 25.80% in 2024 to 26.30% in 2025, confirms the deterioration. The recent signal has similar intensity to the primary one.

Reading within the topic

In Lithuania, the evidence for Poverty & Financial Vulnerability leans towards pressure compared with Europe; related indicators do not provide a sufficiently strong counter-signal. Material recent changes among related indicators lean towards deterioration and warrant monitoring.