European ranking
23 / 30
Worsened by 3 positions since the previous year
An editorial snapshot of country living conditions with trend, regional spread, and context links.
Country overview
Current reading for At-risk-of-poverty rate in a European context.
Eurostat indicator: At-risk-of-poverty rate
Latest value
13.40 Percent of people
European ranking
23 / 30
Worsened by 3 positions since the previous year
Compared with Europe
-1.9 puntos
Netherlands is 1.9 points below the European average.
EU: 15.32
Affected population
≈ 2.42 million people affected
Year: 2025
Embedded regional ranking preview with real regional values and shared semantic bars.
Indicator: At-risk-of-poverty rate
Granularity: Regions
Groningen
18.60
Noord-Holland
14.80
Friesland (NL)
14.40
Limburg (NL)
14.40
Zuid-Holland Centraal
14.00
Zeeland
13.50
Zuid-Holland Zuid
12.30
Drenthe
12.20
Overijssel
12.20
Flevoland
12.20
Gelderland
12.10
Noord-Brabant
11.60
Netherlands performs more favourably than the European benchmark on At-risk-of-poverty rate, with a moderate gap. The trend context points to recent departure from stability. The wider topic context points to broader relative strength. Regional evidence also shows internal variation.
In Netherlands, Poverty risk is noticeably better than the European benchmark: 13.4% versus 16.2% in 2025, with a gap of 2.8 percentage points.
In the Netherlands, the medium-term pattern is broadly stable: the value moved from 13.40% in 2020 to 13.40% in 2025. The primary pattern was broadly stable, but the latest step, from 12.10% in 2024 to 13.40% in 2025, departs from that stability with a deterioration.
In Netherlands, Poverty risk shows noticeable regional variation. Across 12 comparable regions, Groningen records the highest value (18.6%) and Noord-Brabant the lowest (11.6%), a gap of 7 percentage points.
In Netherlands, the evidence for Poverty & Financial Vulnerability leans towards relatively favourable performance compared with Europe, without a clear pressure signal dominating the picture. Recent changes among related indicators are also mixed, with improvement in some and deterioration in others.