European ranking
27 / 30
An editorial snapshot of country living conditions with trend, regional spread, and context links.
Country overview
Current reading for Persons at risk of poverty or social exclusion in a European context.
Eurostat indicator: Persons at risk of poverty or social exclusion
Latest value
15.80 Percent of people
European ranking
27 / 30
Compared with Europe
-4.2 puntos
Netherlands is 4.2 points below the European average.
EU: 20.04
Affected population
≈ 2.85 million people affected
Year: 2025
Embedded regional ranking preview with real regional values and shared semantic bars.
Indicator: Persons at risk of poverty or social exclusion
Granularity: Regions
Groningen
22.40
Zuid-Holland Centraal
17.20
Limburg (NL)
17.20
Noord-Holland
16.90
Zuid-Holland Zuid
15.80
Overijssel
15.80
Friesland (NL)
14.90
Gelderland
14.00
Flevoland
13.90
Zeeland
13.80
Noord-Brabant
13.50
Drenthe
13.30
Netherlands performs more favourably than the European benchmark on Persons at risk of poverty or social exclusion, with a moderate gap. The trend context points to recent departure from stability. The wider topic context points to broader relative strength. Regional evidence also shows internal variation.
In Netherlands, Poverty or exclusion is noticeably better than the European benchmark: 15.8% versus 20.4% in 2025, with a gap of 4.6 percentage points.
In the Netherlands, the medium-term pattern is broadly stable: the value moved from 16.00% in 2020 to 15.80% in 2025. The primary pattern was broadly stable, but the latest step, from 15.40% in 2024 to 15.80% in 2025, departs from that stability with a deterioration.
In Netherlands, Poverty or exclusion shows noticeable regional variation. Across 12 comparable regions, Groningen records the highest value (22.4%) and Drenthe the lowest (13.3%), a gap of 9.1 percentage points.
In Netherlands, the evidence for Poverty & Financial Vulnerability leans towards relatively favourable performance compared with Europe, without a clear pressure signal dominating the picture. Recent changes among related indicators are also mixed, with improvement in some and deterioration in others.