Poland

Regional ranking in Poland · Inability to face unexpected financial expenses

Compare regions in Poland using the indicator Inability to face unexpected financial expenses.

Indicator: unexpected_financial_expenses Year: 2025 Country: Poland Granularity: nuts2

Ranking controls

Explore by year and geography

Regional ranking

Most affected regions in Poland

Regional comparison within the selected country.

Highest burden: Lubuskie (Poland) | Lowest burden: Warszawski stołeczny (Poland)

Editorial summary

Key takeaways

  • Regions included: 17
  • Year: 2025
  • Country: Poland
  • This page ranks 17 regions within Poland for the selected indicator in 2025.
  • Highest region: Lubuskie

Editorial detail

Editorial insights

deviation

Regional spread within Poland

The gap between the highest and lowest regional value is 19.7 points.

summary

Regional ranking within Poland

This page ranks 17 regions within Poland for the selected indicator in 2025.

ranking

Regional extremes in Poland

Lubuskie records the highest value (31.2), while Warszawski stołeczny records the lowest value (11.5).

Indicator: Inability to face unexpected financial expenses

Granularity: Regions

Context Showing regions in Poland.
  1. 1
    –

    Lubuskie

    +9.00

    31.20

    -1.30
  2. 2
    –

    Kujawsko-Pomorskie

    +7.50

    29.70

    -1.10
  3. 3
    –

    Warmińsko-Mazurskie

    +6.60

    28.80

    -0.70
  4. 4
    ▲ 5

    Podkarpackie

    +4.50

    26.70

    +3.00
  5. 5
    –

    Zachodniopomorskie

    +3.80

    26.00

    -0.50
  6. 6
    ▼ 2

    Łódzkie

    +3.50

    25.70

    -3.20
  7. 7
    –

    Opolskie

    +2.10

    24.30

    -0.80
  8. 8
    ▲ 3

    Wielkopolskie

    +1.90

    24.10

    +2.20
  9. 9
    ▲ 1

    Pomorskie

    +1.50

    23.70

    +0.50
  10. 10
    ▼ 2

    Świętokrzyskie

    +1.20

    23.40

    -1.40
  11. 11
    ▲ 4

    Mazowiecki regionalny

    -0.60

    21.60

    +2.20
  12. 12
    –

    Dolnośląskie

    -0.70

    21.50

    -0.30
  13. 13
    ▼ 7

    Podlaskie

    -2.10

    20.10

    -5.90
  14. 14
    ▲ 2

    Małopolskie

    -2.30

    19.90

    +1.10
  15. 15
    ▼ 2

    Śląskie

    -2.30

    19.90

    -1.80
  16. 16
    ▼ 2

    Lubelskie

    -4.10

    18.10

    -3.10
  17. 17
    –

    Warszawski stołeczny

    -10.70

    11.50

    -4.20

Ranking highlights

2025 values. Changes compare 2025 vs 2024.

Inability to face unexpected financial expenses

Increase = worse Decrease = better

By level in 2025

Top 5 regions

2025 values

  1. #1 Lubuskie 31.20
  2. #2 Kujawsko-Pomorskie 29.70
  3. #3 Warmińsko-Mazurskie 28.80
  4. #4 Podkarpackie 26.70
  5. #5 Zachodniopomorskie 26.00

Bottom 5 regions

2025 values

  1. #17 Warszawski stołeczny 11.50
  2. #16 Lubelskie 18.10
  3. #15 Śląskie 19.90
  4. #14 Małopolskie 19.90
  5. #13 Podlaskie 20.10

By change (2025 vs 2024)

Largest increase vs previous year

2025 vs 2024

  1. #1 Podkarpackie +3.00
  2. #2 Wielkopolskie +2.20
  3. #3 Mazowiecki regionalny +2.20
  4. #4 Małopolskie +1.10
  5. #5 Pomorskie +0.50

Largest decrease vs previous year

2025 vs 2024

  1. #1 Podlaskie -5.90
  2. #2 Warszawski stołeczny -4.20
  3. #3 Łódzkie -3.20
  4. #4 Lubelskie -3.10
  5. #5 Śląskie -1.80